SHAKEDOWN: Rape accuser's plan to "make millions" revealed

Theo Rita Theophanous, the wife of Victorian cabinet minister Theo Theophanous has come out swinging at dubious allegations of rape made against him.

Her story reveals many previously unknown facts about the accuser.

It even offers third party verifiable evidence that Theo was home on the night his accuser claims he was out with her. Back then he was Leader of the Opposition in the Legislative Council. He had a driver. The drivers maintain a logbook of where they go and when. The logbook records him being dropped off at home at 6pm.

And there’s much more, a chronicle of the accuser’s disturbed personal life and plan to “make millions” from her accusation.

As we’ve noted previously, in Greece, there has been a rash of high-profile sexual harassment lawsuits against celebrities and high-profile people. It’s clear where her motivation has come from.

Rita’s exposition is a damning indictment on a disturbed accuser, a person whose personal life has been deeply troubled and who appears motivated by greed and evil.

And while the accuser’s name is known to VEXNEWS and many media outlets, we are still restricted from naming her. The accuser, operating from a foreign nation, enjoys more legal protection than one of our most respected elected officials. On this question at least, the law is indeed an ass.

Across both sides of politics, there is deep concern about all of this. Concern by some about the allegation itself, it’s a serious one. Concern by many that if this bizarre process could be unleashed on Theo Theophanous, it could happen to anyone. A claim from ten years ago! A broken, greedy accuser with an active imagination and a full awareness of just how vulnerable politicians can be. Who’s next to be hung out to dry?

In Rita Theophanous’s anguished voice, here is the unvarnished truth of one of Victorian politics most disturbing episodes:

hsunfront THE Victorian State Parliament has resumed sitting. In the front row there is an empty seat normally occupied by my husband, Theo.

He remains in self-imposed exile, accused of a crime so awful that it is a struggle for me to fit inside my head that his name (and mine) is associated with it.

The events of a month ago have catapulted our family into a different reality. We have had to reach far beyond the tears and the pain, beyond the misinformation and the public redefinition of Theo and of who we are as a family.

My children are strong. They have never known a life outside of politics. They are strong in a way that only an acceptance of your vulnerability can make you.

But they are hurting. It is there, in the half-finished meals, the distracted sentences, and the laughter just a pitch too high.

This is not the legacy I would choose to leave them. It won’t be.

Our family is hurting.

My father gets up early and scans the papers for any news. He goes to bed late in case something has broken. He is 84.

My niece got asked to go to the country for a few days. She declined. She told her mother that Uncle Theo might need her to cheer him up. She is 13.

Our friends are hurting too. They cluster round offering words of comfort. They help us affirm who we are.

My decision to speak publicly has been a difficult one to make. I am a proud woman and do not easily share my pain. But it is time some things were said.

My aim is not simply to proclaim my husband’s innocence. Ultimately, that is for the investigation to determine, and the police must be allowed to do their job — methodically, thoroughly. It is rather to try and address an obvious injustice: in coming out publicly, Theo’s accuser has put in the public arena a particular scenario.

This scenario, because of the abhorrent nature of her allegations and the graphic detail in which they were expressed imprints a narrative in the public mind which is almost impossible to erase. Even if the investigation does not result in Theo being charged, my fear is that his innocence will always be doubted in many people’s minds.

I have therefore decided to put forward an alternative narrative that the public may consider based on what I know: I know this woman — not very well, but I know her. She was introduced by a mutual friend. Ten years ago, when she alleges this incident occurred, she was in her 30s.

She was an emergency teacher, and studied acting. I believe she had a number of social problems — with money, with work, with relationships — and that was the case well before the alleged incident.

She had a brother whom she lived with who was also mostly unemployed. She moved to Greece about six years ago. I believe they continue to live together, and that neither she nor her brother have had stable employment since.

I know that while in Australia she continued friendly social contact with Theo for several years after the time of the alleged incident, sometimes in my presence, sometimes alone, sometimes with other people, at both public events and over coffee. I believe that many independent witnesses have verified this.

I know that after the woman went to Greece she provided Theo with contact numbers so they could keep in touch. I know that she sent him greetings from Greece at Christmas and New Year as late as 2003, and talked to him on the phone about the problems she was having settling there.

She may have visited Parliament at some stage. There is nothing unusual in that. But on the night she alleges the incident occurred I believe Theo’s then driver insists he dropped Theo off at 6pm at home, and this is supported by his log book.

I also believe that in the years following the alleged incident, while she was in Melbourne, she had several relationships including with a man engaged to someone else. I believe she was shattered and bitter when he chose to marry his fiancee. I believe she tried desperately to continue the relationship. It was soon after that that she left for Greece.

I do not know why this woman is making these allegations against Theo. I do know that she contacted a mutual friend some 20 months ago and told her that she would “be in the papers” and make lots of money.

I also believe that among the first things she did was to contact selected people in the press, and litigation lawyers, rather than police. I have been told a close friend of her family has said those advising her in Greece right now have told her she stands to “make millions” through this. These are some of the things I know or believe to be true.

I think it is important others should be aware of them too in reaching their conclusions. This is because the woman has the protection of anonymity and lives in another country. She may never be held accountable if her allegations turn out to be false. My husband and my family cannot, however, hide from public exposure.

Theo’s solicitor has informed police of what we believe are important facts contained in this letter for them to independently verify.

We look forward to them being thoroughly investigated before police make any recommendation to the DPP, because the mere laying of charges leaves an indelible stain, even if someone is found innocent.

Finally, let me say that when I looked at what I believe to be the facts: this woman’s past experiences; the consistency in her behaviour before and after the alleged incident; her friendly messages and continued contact with Theo for years afterwards, and; the priority given to
litigation lawyers when she finally decided to make her allegations, and I can only conclude that her story is a fabrication.

It makes me sad for my family and angry at the impact this will have for the genuine victims of such crimes.

Advertisements

23 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

23 responses to “SHAKEDOWN: Rape accuser's plan to "make millions" revealed

  1. hatchet job

    yeah and of course his wife is not at all biased.

  2. james

    hatchet job – you seem to be suggesting that he can be publicly accused of the most awful of crimes, and yet it’s somehow illegitimate for anyone to speak in his defence?

  3. Will Fowles

    Even I am sickened by dredging up ten year old allegations and presenting them as credible. The Age really went too far with that.

  4. Anonymous

    Congratulations Andrew. The Age treatment of this scandalous allegation is beyond contempt.

    Theo is a good and decent man and Rita is a good and decent woman. Good on you Rita for supporting your husband.

    Why should the name of a woman making allegations against a man be suppressed and the man has his name plastered all over the newspapers? Who was responsible for this? Was it Peter Duncan, the disgraceful Lefty from South Australia? Or was it Brian Dixon, Minister in the Hamer and Thompson governments? Shame on the MPs who fell for this feminist trap.

  5. Anonymous

    It is similar with the EPA-Stasi in Victoria. False allegations are frequently made against persons who are claimed to have thrown cigarettes out of their car windows. The government sees this as a source of revenue and will not investigate false complaints, even when they are against prison warders. Shame.

  6. Anonymous

    And what punishment is available for the woman who from under the cloak of secrecy pointed the finger of false acusations?

  7. Anonymous

    “This is because the woman has the protection of anonymity and lives in another country.”

    So very sad and very true. This saga of one party hiding in secrecy and the other under the glare of the public spotlight is very wrong.

    Both should be public or neither public.

  8. Will Fowles

    I know that after the woman went to Greece she provided Theo with contact numbers so they could keep in touch. I know that she sent him greetings from Greece at Christmas and New Year as late as 2003, and talked to him on the phone about the problems she was having settling there.

    How is that consistent with her claims of rape years before?

    You don’t need to be Sherlock Holmes to tell this is a very dodgy business.

    Why does one send Xmas greets to one’s rapist?

  9. anon

    who ghost-wrote that statement?

  10. Nostradamus

    Wonder what the visitors’ book for the night in question says?

  11. kk

    ah logbooks – bill heffernan knows a thing or two about them

  12. evil bastard

    comeback day will be 24 or 25 november

  13. Stephen Conroy

    How dare these nameless bastards attack such a fine labor person and their family in this way. If people are willing to accuse, then let them reveal themselves.

  14. Anonymous

    Gotta love how Rita gave her story as an exclusive to the Hun as a big up yours to the aged.

  15. Anonymous

    Until the law is changed, men will have their characters sullied by nameless female accusers.

    We all understand that in the case of rape, the accuser’s anonymity is important… but somehow the law needs framing to allow the naming and shaming of undeniably fraudelent accusers. This should be done on the result of a successful procecution of the accuser for a new crime “false rape allegations” for which the punishment is of the same magnitude as that of rape.

    Simple. The man’s character has been raped.

    Alternatively, If this type of law cannot be enacted then the accused rapist’s name should also be anonymous until conviction.

  16. What is the truth of this relationship?

    I know that while in Australia she continued friendly social contact with Theo for several years after the time of the alleged incident, sometimes in my presence, sometimes alone, sometimes with other people, at both public events and over coffee. I believe that many independent witnesses have verified this.

    I know that after the woman went to Greece she provided Theo with contact numbers so they could keep in touch. I know that she sent him greetings from Greece at Christmas and New Year as late as 2003, and talked to him on the phone about the problems she was having settling there.

    She may have visited Parliament at some stage. There is nothing unusual in that.

  17. Anonymous

    True. The accused’s name should also be anonomous. Both anonomous or both public. The “victim” can decide which.

  18. Dick

    Theo purports to be a leader. His behaviour, obviously, needed to be impeccable. If the lady is to be believed, Theo got over-amourous and crossed the big red line.

  19. Wow Dick

    That is an amazing insight Dick.

    Thank you for sharing it with us.

  20. Reds are better in bed

    Theo was right to support the abortion bill. Why should a man who had to force a women to stay still then have to pay child support?

  21. samantha-liopoulous-smith-walsh, senior the third

    It makes me sad and disgusted that Ms Theophanous would use the Greek community and it’s paper to manipulate the police and public’s perception.

    This is not right at all, where is the legal process here….zilch.

    Smart move but tacky and desperate.

    No Rita, it does not hurt Greek-Australians image in the slightest as we don’t care about this crap nor do we find that a trivial paper like Neos Kosmos would publish it..silly move there.

    It’s great fodder i’m sure for all the peasant gossips that read the paper.

  22. anonymous

    So “little S”, did you give a full report to your deranged friend? Whats your cut?
    Anonymous but onto you

  23. What's Happening?

    It is now more than one month since the accusation was laid against the Minister. He has stood down from his position – but what is happening? This is a disgrace. If every MP who has had an affair had to stand down – would there be any left? Come on VicPol, this is a joke.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s