BLOODY LIBEL: Angry ex-Liberal candidate launches repeated anti-semitic attacks on academic

irfanyusuf Last month, Pakistani born Sydney lawyer Irfan Yusuf falsely accused a Jewish-American academic Daniel Pipes of declaring that Europe’s next Holocaust would be against Muslims and that they “thoroughly deserved such slaughter”.

Brooke Goldstein of ICJS Research reports Pipes protested vigorously after the Canberra Times published Yusuf’s claim.

She explains:

On August 18, 2008, the Canberra Times, an Australian newspaper, published Yusuf’s “Justice the remedy required to help Bosnia heal.” In it, Yusuf mentioned a speech Mr. Pipes delivered to a dinner hosted by Quadrant magazine earlier this year which was subsequently published as “Europe or Eurabia?” in the Australian newspaper. Yusuf incorrectly stated that in his speech, Mr. Pipes had

predicted Europe’s next Holocaust victims would be Muslim migrants. Frighteningly, Pipes suggested that Muslims thoroughly deserved such slaughter.

Upon receipt of Mr. Pipes’s protest against this sickening misrepresentation, Irfan Yusuf and the Canberra Times agreed to issue a public correction, retraction, and apology, which appeared in the newspaper’s print and online editions:

The Canberra Times and Irfan Yusuf accept that Mr Pipes never predicted nor has he ever endorsed a Holocaust of European Muslims, and they unreservedly apologise to him for the errors.

Most troubling is not that Yusuf made a single error, odious as it was. He appears to have form for falsely disparaging Daniel Pipes repeatedly. It’s enough to make us wonder why Crikey and other publications continue to pay him money for his race-baiting and erroneous words of hate.



Filed under Uncategorized

9 responses to “BLOODY LIBEL: Angry ex-Liberal candidate launches repeated anti-semitic attacks on academic

  1. Anon

    Yusuf is LINO filth – he sits alongside other Liberal Rat traitors like Chrissy Kerr, Stephen Mayne and Chas Richardson.

    Hang on a minute – what do all of these LINO slimeballs have in common?

    They work or have worked for Nameless – shit sheet for the wacko-left in Australian politics.

  2. anon

    He looks a bit like Inga Binga.

  3. Thank you so much for the free plug, Mr Andrew Landeryou! I so so appreciate being attacked and defamed by you. It’s like being kissed by a pig wearing lipstick. But I’d better not talk about pigs, should I? After all, both our religions aren’t exactly fond of them.

    Anyway, in relation to Pipes I did make a minor mistake. I should have in fact just cut and paste what Pipes actually wrote, which is far scarier than my interpretation of what he wrote.

    One final thing, Andrew. Do you think that Europe will become Eurabia? Do you think Muslim migrants and their kids are completely incapable of comfortably fitting into Western society? Do you think Muslim migrants breed so much that they out-breed their host communities?

    Because if you agree with these proposterous suggestions, I would request that you continue attacking me. It will just add so much to my credibility.

    Finally, I’ll have to add you to my blog’s right hand margin. Your comments here are a ringing endorsement. But I need a photo of you. Can you send me one? Because if I don’t get one soon, I might just have to place a photo of a lipstick-wearing pig. How does that sound?

  4. Walter Plinge

    Fair crack. He’s obviously got some ‘orrible skin disease. And perhaps it’s not just skin deep.

  5. that’s a fair sledge, Irfan.
    just one thing: it’s an heroic assumption on your part to assume Andy’s religious leanings.
    I would doubt he subscribes to a brand that forbids pigs. i have seen him chow down on at least one double bacon ColonelBurger Deluxe.
    and call Andy what you like, he’s no hypocrite.

  6. Andrew, tell us. Do you support the Eurabia thesis? Do you think Muslims are outbreeding non-Muslims in the West? Do you think Australia will become Austarabia?

    Do you support the sentiments contained in Pipes’ speech to Quadrant? Go on. Share your views on these issues with us.

  7. Anon

    Perhaps it should be the Muslim men that should wear the burqua, rather than the women!

  8. Irfan, I don’t know or care about which group is growing or shrinking other than Essendon supporters, who should, in my opinion, be rapidly expanding in number and taking over the world.

    I don’t agree with everything Pipes says but that’s not the point of what I wrote. He didn’t ever say what you said he said. That’s the point. You apologised and I’m glad you did.

  9. Daniel Lewis

    Irfan’s apology was as empty as his third bucket of KFC.

    Just today he wrote another article in Crikey, slagging off Campus Watch, without mentioning who its director is – Daniel Pipes.

    As you noted, he has continuing form in attempting to discredit Pipes. However Andrew, at least Irfan had the courtesy to ask your permission before quoting you out of context on one of his many blogs (when one blog just ain’t enough). In my case, he simply quoted me out of context, failed to link to the source and even added a picture of some grafitti attempting to suggest I was somehow responsible for it. For a guy who spends his whole life threatening to sue others for defamation, boy can he dish it out. Too bad he can’t take it, sooky la la.

    Pipes would of course wipe the floor with Irfan if he could be bothered, but he knows Irfan is little more than an inconsequential twerp on his way to a complete public meltdown. If a coronary doesn’t get him first.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s